New maximum drawdown
Why it matters: The vault is 51.9% below its previous equity peak — the deepest decline in its tracked history.
Every qualified vault scored on performance, risk, consistency, manager alignment and the strength of the evidence behind it. Rankings are organic and never for sale.
Highest HV Score — return, risk, consistency and evidence combined.
Repeatable results rather than one outsized winning period.
Smallest historical decline from a previous equity peak.
Younger vaults clearing qualification — lower confidence by design.
Strong returns paired with elevated or extreme risk profiles.
Managers holding the largest share of their own vault.
What's changing across Hyperliquid vaults right now.
Why it matters: The vault is 51.9% below its previous equity peak — the deepest decline in its tracked history.
Why it matters: Net exposure moved from -100.0% to 100.0% of gross exposure — the vault is now net long across 1 position.
Why it matters: 30-day realized volatility is 74% above its trailing 90-day median.
Why it matters: Largest qualified vaults rank moved from #6 to #5 among 178 eligible vaults.
Why it matters: Highest Sharpe rank moved from #6 to #5 among 173 eligible vaults.
Why it matters: ZRO long exposure fell by $35K (50.4%), and now represents 27.8% of the vault's total exposure.
A high APR usually reflects high leverage, a short lucky streak, or a single outsized trade. The HV Score weights risk and consistency as heavily as return, and lowers confidence when a vault simply has not existed long enough to prove anything. Nothing here is investment advice, and past performance never guarantees future results.
Read the full methodology →