Rapid drawdown
Why it matters: Drawdown deepened from 22.7% to 38.1% in 3 days.
Every qualified vault scored on performance, risk, consistency, manager alignment and the strength of the evidence behind it. Rankings are organic and never for sale.
Highest HV Score — return, risk, consistency and evidence combined.
Repeatable results rather than one outsized winning period.
Smallest historical decline from a previous equity peak.
Younger vaults clearing qualification — lower confidence by design.
Strong returns paired with elevated or extreme risk profiles.
Managers holding the largest share of their own vault.
What's changing across Hyperliquid vaults right now.
Why it matters: Drawdown deepened from 22.7% to 38.1% in 3 days.
Why it matters: Highest Sharpe rank moved from #6 to #5 among 179 eligible vaults.
Why it matters: Gross exposure of $279 is 9.2× below the vault's median of $3K over the tracked window.
Why it matters: A new long position worth $60K was opened — 183.7% of vault equity and 22.5% of total exposure.
Why it matters: 50.6% of vault equity entered over the past 7D.
Why it matters: 49.3% of vault equity entered over the past 7D.
A high APR usually reflects high leverage, a short lucky streak, or a single outsized trade. The HV Score weights risk and consistency as heavily as return, and lowers confidence when a vault simply has not existed long enough to prove anything. Nothing here is investment advice, and past performance never guarantees future results.
Read the full methodology →